How to make the most of creditors’ meetings (part 2)

Creditors must be proactive in creditors' meetings
Creditors in a statutory insolvency procedure have very little time to react and respond

Creditors in a statutory insolvency procedure must request and attend a physical creditors’ meeting if they want to assert any significant influence. A meeting of creditors normally takes place shortly after a company becomes insolvent.

There creditors get the chance to:

  • Hear an explanation of why the business failed  
  • Appoint an insolvency practitioner (IP)
  • Agree the IP’s fees
  • Vote on how to move the business forward

These meetings are essential to the insolvency process because they:

  • Keep creditors informed
  • Give creditors an opportunity to confer, discuss, and comprehend the situation before voting on the IP’s proposal and fees

However, the time you have to request a meeting has reduced considerably in recent years. Usually, an IP sends creditors a proposal and other documents to notify them of the impending insolvency procedure.

Upon receipt, an astute creditor will move swiftly to:

  • Engage and galvanise other creditors
  • Form 1 unified body of creditors
  • Request a physical creditors’ meeting (which convened automatically before the introduction of the Insolvency Rules 2016)

Request a creditors’ meeting quickly as your time is limited

But creditors have less than 1 week to respond and take action thanks to the 2016 Rules, which says:

Creditors are deemed to have automatically approved the IP’s appointment unless 10% or more (by total debt value) request a meeting of creditors within 5 business days.

The upshot of these restrictive measures is that creditors have almost no time to:

  • Organise themselves
  • Request a creditors’ meeting
  • Consider the IP’s proposal
  • Conceive and implement an alternative plan of action

The 2016 Rules were supposedly introduced to counter creditor apathy by simplifying insolvency procedures. But in reality, the legislation made a complex regime more problematic, and further alienated creditors from the insolvency process.

Furthermore, there is no legislation relating to IP remuneration. Consequently, IPs often discourage creditors by charging excessive fees to hold meetings.

However, creditors who want empowerment will push the IP to host a physical meeting.

I&L can take instructions on your behalf to attend and represent your interests at meetings. Frequently, we connect with other creditors to generate considerable support before the meeting takes place.

Read more on this subject here

Commercial Debt Collection: Challenges and Best Practices

09/05/2024

Commercial debt collection is the process through which outstanding debts owed by commercial entities are recovered, typically stemming from goods delivered or services rendered on…

Read More
GFSC

Gibraltar Financial Services Commission: A Lesson in Financial Regulation

27/03/2024

The recent collapse of High Street Group and its security trustee, Castle Trust Management and Services, prompts a closer examination of regulatory practices. Along with…

Read More
de trafford

De Trafford Third Party Recovery: An Update

29/02/2024

The recent financial collapse of multiple DeTrafford property development companies hassignificantly impacted purchasers. As they navigate the consequences, a glimmer of hope arises asthe wheels…

Read More
Northumberland Living

Northumberland Living Developments: Allegations and Challenges

22/02/2024

Northumberland Living, In West Chevington Farm, Druridge Bay, is a development poised for completion. Only to be stalled by an apparent unforeseen historical conveyancing issue.…

Read More