How to make the most of creditors’ meetings (part 2)

Creditors in a statutory insolvency procedure must request and attend a physical creditors’ meeting if they want to assert any significant influence. A meeting of creditors normally takes place shortly after a company becomes insolvent.
There creditors get the chance to:
- Hear an explanation of why the business failed
- Appoint an insolvency practitioner (IP)
- Agree the IP’s fees
- Vote on how to move the business forward
These meetings are essential to the insolvency process because they:
- Keep creditors informed
- Give creditors an opportunity to confer, discuss, and comprehend the situation before voting on the IP’s proposal and fees
However, the time you have to request a meeting has reduced considerably in recent years. Usually, an IP sends creditors a proposal and other documents to notify them of the impending insolvency procedure.
Upon receipt, an astute creditor will move swiftly to:
- Engage and galvanise other creditors
- Form 1 unified body of creditors
- Request a physical creditors’ meeting (which convened automatically before the introduction of the Insolvency Rules 2016)
Request a creditors’ meeting quickly as your time is limited
But creditors have less than 1 week to respond and take action thanks to the 2016 Rules, which says:
Creditors are deemed to have automatically approved the IP’s appointment unless 10% or more (by total debt value) request a meeting of creditors within 5 business days.
The upshot of these restrictive measures is that creditors have almost no time to:
- Organise themselves
- Request a creditors’ meeting
- Consider the IP’s proposal
- Conceive and implement an alternative plan of action
The 2016 Rules were supposedly introduced to counter creditor apathy by simplifying insolvency procedures. But in reality, the legislation made a complex regime more problematic, and further alienated creditors from the insolvency process.
Furthermore, there is no legislation relating to IP remuneration. Consequently, IPs often discourage creditors by charging excessive fees to hold meetings.
However, creditors who want empowerment will push the IP to host a physical meeting.
I&L can take instructions on your behalf to attend and represent your interests at meetings. Frequently, we connect with other creditors to generate considerable support before the meeting takes place.
Read more on this subject here
79th Group Update: The Webster Family Freezing Order – Decisive Action or Delayed Optics?
A worldwide freezing order (WFO) was recently granted against David Webster and his sons Jake and Curtis. Long‑time directors and central figures in the 79th…
Read MoreThe 79th Group: When Law Meets Accountability- Why Creditors Deserve Their Day in Court
The story of The 79th Group is no longer just about a failed investment scheme. It is about what happens to ordinary people when the…
Read MoreAfter the Tide Turns: Accountability and Silence in the Armstrong Infrastructure & Property Finance Loan Note Collapse
When the tide goes out, we see who’s been swimming in borrowed confidence, and for investors in Armstrong Infrastructure & Property Finance Limited (AIPF), the…
Read MoreThird-Party Actions Part Two: How Creditors Build Real Recovery Claims
In Part One, we explained what third-party actions are and why they matter in insolvency. This second part focuses on how creditors actually build those…
Read More