Is Vince Cable Brave Enough to Take on the Insolvency Industry?

When we blogged about David Cameron’s u-turn on insolvency reform back in October, who would’ve imagined that Business Secretary Vince Cable would follow suit – certainly not us.

In June, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) released a damning report calling for sweeping reforms of the insolvency industry.

Cable was supposed to respond to the review three months ago, but has so far failed to deliver an official statement on the government’s plans to tackle the damaging conflicts of interest that permeate the industry.

To be honest, I don’t think he has the stomach to take on such a politically charged subject right now. He has enough on his plate with the student fees fiasco and is being criticised by Downing Street; and stripped of his media, telecom and broadcasting responsibilities.

Responding to the OFT’s report would strike fear into the hearts of insolvency practitioners and Cable wouldn’t want to upset the applecart.

The problem is; IPs’ interests and those of the business industry are incompatible. Cable will have to make a decision at some point, but why would he do it now?

The OFT says the industry has no effective mandate to discipline wayward IPs and should move away from self regulation (everyone knows that self-regulation rarely works).

A new framework must be introduced, but I don’t believe Cable’s ready to strip IPs of their lucrative income fees; they currently earn 20 percent of an insolvent company’s assets.

That’s a shockingly high percentage, which regulation would reduce. Furthermore, IPs set their own fees, which is absolutely scandalous.

Looking at Cable, I just can’t see him doing that at the moment; you just know these aren’t his priorities.

It’s going to take a very brave Business Secretary to champion the cause of small business over that of the Insolvency Practitioners Association.

When he was in opposition, Cable was pro small business, but he can’t serve two masters.

Sadly, it’s the small businesses that will bare the brunt of the burden as they are usually unsecured creditors.

Banks, lenders and finance companies don’t lose out because most of their lending is secured and they have cosy relationships with IPs anyway.

So it’s small business owners who are obliged to extend credit when sometimes it should not be extended. For unsecured creditors, the process is largely undemocratic.

The public trusted Cable with the economy more than the current Chancellor George Osborne or his predecessor, Alistair Darling.

But the Business Secretary’s credibility has taken a battering recently; especially after journalists from the Telegraph secretly tapped him bragging about going to war with Rupert Murdoch.

That said, his management of these essential and long-overdue insolvency reform proposals could go some way to repairing his reputation.

Posted in

Commercial Debt Collection: Challenges and Best Practices


Commercial debt collection is the process through which outstanding debts owed by commercial entities are recovered, typically stemming from goods delivered or services rendered on…

Read More

Gibraltar Financial Services Commission: A Lesson in Financial Regulation


The recent collapse of High Street Group and its security trustee, Castle Trust Management and Services, prompts a closer examination of regulatory practices. Along with…

Read More
de trafford

De Trafford Third Party Recovery: An Update


The recent financial collapse of multiple DeTrafford property development companies hassignificantly impacted purchasers. As they navigate the consequences, a glimmer of hope arises asthe wheels…

Read More
Northumberland Living

Northumberland Living Developments: Allegations and Challenges


Northumberland Living, In West Chevington Farm, Druridge Bay, is a development poised for completion. Only to be stalled by an apparent unforeseen historical conveyancing issue.…

Read More