Appeal court win for company directors

Creditors need greater protection following the appeal ruling at the Supreme Court for England, Wales and Northern Ireland…

The UK Supreme Court recently dismissed a claim for a law change that would force company directors to take creditors into account at the first sign of insolvency.

Instead, the Supreme Court upheld the current law. As a result, directors only need to prioritise creditors when company insolvency is highly likely. Under the current ruling, company directors do not have to act immediately. A director’s duty to creditors only triggers when a company:

  • Becomes insolvent
  • Is on the brink of insolvency

In a recent case, debt collector BTI filed a lawsuit against Scottish paper maker Sequana.

Supreme Court blow for creditors

The action sought to reclaim a £188m dividend paid to Sequana by subsidiary company AWA. Although AWA was solvent at the time, the company had long-term pollution liabilities, which made insolvency a likely outcome.

BTI brought a claim against the AWA directors who allowed the payment. They argued that by making the payment, the directors had breached their duty to protect creditors’ interests. BTI’s appeal was, however, dismissed.

The Supreme Court ruled that considering the circumstances when AWA paid the dividend, the company’s directors were not obliged to:

  1. Consider creditors
  2. Act in creditors’ interests

Pro-director ruling

The Supreme Court’s findings should please directors as they suggest that creditors only need to be considered if:

  • Insolvency is imminent
  • It becomes more likely than not the company will become insolvent

However, this move will annoy creditors who may justifiably argue the ruling:

  • Ignores the risks creditors face
  • Gives directors a licence to do as they please

And there is one important question: how does anyone determine when a company is on the brink of insolvency? The Supreme Court’s ruling did not specify. The precise moment that triggers this duty remains unknown and seemingly at the discretion of directors.

The 79th Group- Administration Update And What It Means for You as a Loan Note Holder

16/05/2025

Over the past few weeks, a wave of The 79th Group companies has collapsed into formal administration, putting millions of pounds of Loan Note Holders…

Read More

Who’s Behind Billy Jackson? Uncovering the Team and the Companies

09/05/2025

Part 3- Unravelling the Team Behind Billy Jackson Executive Summary -Billy Jackson operates a network of companies heavily reliant on Loan Note investments, many of…

Read More
the 79th group

The 79th Group Update-What You Need To Know

05/05/2025

Administrations, Court Cases, and What Loan Note Holders Must Know Now The financial collapse of companies within The 79th Group is rapidly entering a critical…

Read More

T&T Trustees Appoint Administrators to 79th Luxury Living Six

25/04/2025

Are Investor Interests Being Protected? A New Twist in The 79th Group Saga Loan note holders in 79th Luxury Living Six Ltd (LL6) were recently…

Read More