Appeal court win for company directors

Creditors need greater protection following the appeal ruling at the Supreme Court for England, Wales and Northern Ireland…

The UK Supreme Court recently dismissed a claim for a law change that would force company directors to take creditors into account at the first sign of insolvency.

Instead, the Supreme Court upheld the current law. As a result, directors only need to prioritise creditors when company insolvency is highly likely. Under the current ruling, company directors do not have to act immediately. A director’s duty to creditors only triggers when a company:

  • Becomes insolvent
  • Is on the brink of insolvency

In a recent case, debt collector BTI filed a lawsuit against Scottish paper maker Sequana.

Supreme Court blow for creditors

The action sought to reclaim a £188m dividend paid to Sequana by subsidiary company AWA. Although AWA was solvent at the time, the company had long-term pollution liabilities, which made insolvency a likely outcome.

BTI brought a claim against the AWA directors who allowed the payment. They argued that by making the payment, the directors had breached their duty to protect creditors’ interests. BTI’s appeal was, however, dismissed.

The Supreme Court ruled that considering the circumstances when AWA paid the dividend, the company’s directors were not obliged to:

  1. Consider creditors
  2. Act in creditors’ interests

Pro-director ruling

The Supreme Court’s findings should please directors as they suggest that creditors only need to be considered if:

  • Insolvency is imminent
  • It becomes more likely than not the company will become insolvent

However, this move will annoy creditors who may justifiably argue the ruling:

  • Ignores the risks creditors face
  • Gives directors a licence to do as they please

And there is one important question: how does anyone determine when a company is on the brink of insolvency? The Supreme Court’s ruling did not specify. The precise moment that triggers this duty remains unknown and seemingly at the discretion of directors.

the 79th group

A Difficult Truth: The 79th Group’s Latest Statement

17/04/2025

On 10 April, The 79th Group issued a public statement in response to the ongoing investigation by the City of London Police, which can be…

Read More
the 79th group

The Cold Truth About The 79th Group, the Police, and Your Money

11/04/2025

The 79th Group Loan Notes Recovery Over the past several months, a growing number of investors have come forward, alarmed and confused by what’s happening…

Read More

High Street GRP – The Security That Never Was…

08/04/2025

High Street GRP promised investors that their money was safe — secured against valuable real estate. In reality, there was no meaningful security, and over…

Read More
the 79th group

The 79th Group Loan Notes- Troubling Security Trustee Issues

04/04/2025

As The 79th Group suspends redemption and interest payments on its loan notes and ceases to respond to concerned investors, scrutiny is intensifying over the…

Read More