Appeal court win for company directors

Creditors need greater protection following the appeal ruling at the Supreme Court for England, Wales and Northern Ireland…

The UK Supreme Court recently dismissed a claim for a law change that would force company directors to take creditors into account at the first sign of insolvency.

Instead, the Supreme Court upheld the current law. As a result, directors only need to prioritise creditors when company insolvency is highly likely. Under the current ruling, company directors do not have to act immediately. A director’s duty to creditors only triggers when a company:

  • Becomes insolvent
  • Is on the brink of insolvency

In a recent case, debt collector BTI filed a lawsuit against Scottish paper maker Sequana.

Supreme Court blow for creditors

The action sought to reclaim a £188m dividend paid to Sequana by subsidiary company AWA. Although AWA was solvent at the time, the company had long-term pollution liabilities, which made insolvency a likely outcome.

BTI brought a claim against the AWA directors who allowed the payment. They argued that by making the payment, the directors had breached their duty to protect creditors’ interests. BTI’s appeal was, however, dismissed.

The Supreme Court ruled that considering the circumstances when AWA paid the dividend, the company’s directors were not obliged to:

  1. Consider creditors
  2. Act in creditors’ interests

Pro-director ruling

The Supreme Court’s findings should please directors as they suggest that creditors only need to be considered if:

  • Insolvency is imminent
  • It becomes more likely than not the company will become insolvent

However, this move will annoy creditors who may justifiably argue the ruling:

  • Ignores the risks creditors face
  • Gives directors a licence to do as they please

And there is one important question: how does anyone determine when a company is on the brink of insolvency? The Supreme Court’s ruling did not specify. The precise moment that triggers this duty remains unknown and seemingly at the discretion of directors.

the 79th group

The Grim Truth for Loan Note Holders -79th Luxury Living Six Ltd (LL6)

18/06/2025

No assets or safeguards. No clear path to recovery. If you’re one of the many investors who entrusted your money to The 79th Group’s loan…

Read More

Overdrawn Directors’ Loan Accounts: How to Avoid Trouble

16/06/2025

Many company directors borrow money from their businesses through what’s known as a director’s loan account (DLA). In principle, there’s nothing wrong with this, so…

Read More

Debt Assignment Explained: A Strategic Tool for Creditors

10/06/2025

In today’s volatile commercial landscape, unpaid debts can severely undermine cash flow, disrupt operations, and threaten the survival of a business. For creditors facing non-performing…

Read More

The 79th Group Administration: What It Means for Loan Note Holders

06/06/2025

As The 79th Group enters administration, many loan note holders are left uncertain about what this means for their investment. What happens to the money?…

Read More