Appeal court win for company directors

Creditors need greater protection following the appeal ruling at the Supreme Court for England, Wales and Northern Ireland…

The UK Supreme Court recently dismissed a claim for a law change that would force company directors to take creditors into account at the first sign of insolvency.

Instead, the Supreme Court upheld the current law. As a result, directors only need to prioritise creditors when company insolvency is highly likely. Under the current ruling, company directors do not have to act immediately. A director’s duty to creditors only triggers when a company:

  • Becomes insolvent
  • Is on the brink of insolvency

In a recent case, debt collector BTI filed a lawsuit against Scottish paper maker Sequana.

Supreme Court blow for creditors

The action sought to reclaim a £188m dividend paid to Sequana by subsidiary company AWA. Although AWA was solvent at the time, the company had long-term pollution liabilities, which made insolvency a likely outcome.

BTI brought a claim against the AWA directors who allowed the payment. They argued that by making the payment, the directors had breached their duty to protect creditors’ interests. BTI’s appeal was, however, dismissed.

The Supreme Court ruled that considering the circumstances when AWA paid the dividend, the company’s directors were not obliged to:

  1. Consider creditors
  2. Act in creditors’ interests

Pro-director ruling

The Supreme Court’s findings should please directors as they suggest that creditors only need to be considered if:

  • Insolvency is imminent
  • It becomes more likely than not the company will become insolvent

However, this move will annoy creditors who may justifiably argue the ruling:

  • Ignores the risks creditors face
  • Gives directors a licence to do as they please

And there is one important question: how does anyone determine when a company is on the brink of insolvency? The Supreme Court’s ruling did not specify. The precise moment that triggers this duty remains unknown and seemingly at the discretion of directors.

GFSC

Gibraltar Financial Services Commission: A Lesson in Financial Regulation

27/03/2024

The recent collapse of High Street Group and its security trustee, Castle Trust Management and Services, prompts a closer examination of regulatory practices. Along with…

Read More
de trafford

De Trafford Third Party Recovery: An Update

29/02/2024

The recent financial collapse of multiple DeTrafford property development companies hassignificantly impacted purchasers. As they navigate the consequences, a glimmer of hope arises asthe wheels…

Read More
Northumberland Living

Northumberland Living Developments: Allegations and Challenges

22/02/2024

Northumberland Living, In West Chevington Farm, Druridge Bay, is a development poised for completion. Only to be stalled by an apparent unforeseen historical conveyancing issue.…

Read More
st anne's limited development

St Anne’s Street Limited: The Perils of Off-Plan Property Purchases

15/02/2024

Two luxury housing developments in Liverpool have faced major setbacks, leaving purchasers indespair and dreams of new homes shattered. St Anne’s Street Limited and Chaloner…

Read More