Business rescue advice: administration vs CVL

Most of the duties an IP carries out when a company is in administration can also be performed in a creditors’ voluntary liquidation (CVL)

When directors resolve not to rescue an insolvent company, an insolvency practitioner (IP) may recommend placing the company into administration. However, in many instances a creditors’ voluntary liquidation (CVL) would be a more suitable insolvency procedure.

Whereas companies remain in administration for at least 12 months, CVLs usually take less time and therefore incur fewer costs. Lowering costs in a statutory insolvency procedure benefits creditors’ because any savings help to increase the amount creditors receive.

When the administration ends, the IP will move the company into a CVL if it’s appropriate to do so. Money cannot be distributed to creditors in administration without a court order, so the CVL is used as a payment instrument.

Nonetheless, an IP in a CVL can perform most of the duties an IP performs in administration. Subsequently, opting for a CVL without first entering administration saves money, and helps creditors increase the amount they receive.

So why do some insolvency practitioners recommend administration over a CVL even though all that’s required is for them to:

  • Realise the insolvent company’s assets into cash
  • Make distributions to creditors?

CVLs are usually less expensive than administration

1 possible explanation is the total fee the IP intends to charge cannot be justified with a straightforward liquidation. Administrations can provide an unscrupulous IP with an excuse to charge extra fees, much like a London taxi driver taking a tourist on a 5-mile journey from Piccadilly Circus to Leicester Square.

Some IPs take their clients for a ride. To avoid this happening to you, always seek advice from an independent expert before entering into a statutory insolvency procedure.

Before contacting an IP, it’s important to consider if a director of the company has:

  • Conducted antecedent transactions before the insolvency
  • Made preferential payments since the insolvency
  • Become indebted to the company through an overdrawn director’s loan account

The director(s) of a company that’s entering a CVL will require an IP who understands their particular situation. It’s important that you try not to mislead or upset your IP because they can:

  • Request money to reimburse an antecedent transaction 
  • File an unflattering or adverse account of the director’s behaviour in the ‘D’ report that must be sent the disqualification unit of the Government’s Insolvency Service

You must be confident that your conduct as a director was lawful as the IP has a legal duty to act in the interest of the company’s creditors. As a result, it would be unwise to rely upon an IP for impartial advice.


Gibraltar Financial Services Commission: A Lesson in Financial Regulation


The recent collapse of High Street Group and its security trustee, Castle Trust Management and Services, prompts a closer examination of regulatory practices. Along with…

Read More
de trafford

De Trafford Third Party Recovery: An Update


The recent financial collapse of multiple DeTrafford property development companies hassignificantly impacted purchasers. As they navigate the consequences, a glimmer of hope arises asthe wheels…

Read More
Northumberland Living

Northumberland Living Developments: Allegations and Challenges


Northumberland Living, In West Chevington Farm, Druridge Bay, is a development poised for completion. Only to be stalled by an apparent unforeseen historical conveyancing issue.…

Read More
st anne's limited development

St Anne’s Street Limited: The Perils of Off-Plan Property Purchases


Two luxury housing developments in Liverpool have faced major setbacks, leaving purchasers indespair and dreams of new homes shattered. St Anne’s Street Limited and Chaloner…

Read More