Benefits of a creditors’ committee

A committee comprising 3 to 5 creditors supervises all the IP’s fees and transactions

Creditors in a statutory insolvency procedure should establish a creditors’ committee if they want to influence proceedings, set the basis for the insolvency practitioner’s fees, and increase dividends for the general body of creditors.

A creditors’ committee consists of 3 to 5 people who are responsible for setting the basis of the insolvency practitioner (IP)’s remuneration. Creditors’ committees are essential to the insolvency process, but they empower creditors so IPs tend to avoid them.

Usually, the insolvency practitioner will notify creditors by sending a proposal with resolutions asking them:

  • To pay the IP’s outstanding and proposed fees
  • Not to form a creditors’ committee

Creditors must vote to either accept or reject the resolutions. Most simply tick the boxes and post the documents back. But few creditors are aware or understand that by voting blindly in this way, they’re telling the IP:

“You are free to charge whatever fees you like. Additionally, we promise not to form a committee to oversee how you work and pay yourself.”

As individuals, creditors have very little control over the insolvency practitioner or their work. But creditors who establish a creditors’ committee get to:

  • Determine the IP’s pay package
  • Supervise the IP’s transactions

IPs avoid creditors’ committees

Establishing a creditors’ committee is a basic creditor right. Nevertheless, IP resolutions asking creditors not to form 1 have become popular.

It’s a strange situation because although IPs are employed by creditors, they routinely avoid supervision by and accountability to them.

Furthermore, very few creditors realise that forming a creditors’ committee can drastically reduce the IP’s fees. In many cases, the savings allow for creditors to receive a greater dividend, and more quickly.

For example, last year 1 of our clients was owed money by a company that entered administration. The administrator / IP charged over £200,000 for the first 8 weeks of work, and proposed: 

  • Placing the company into liquidation after 10 months of administration
  • Charging a further £200,000 in administration fees
  • Charging £200,000 in liquidation fees

In response, Insolvency & Law utilised the power of the creditors’ committee and asked the IP to:

  • Reduce their initial £200,000 charge to £120,000 (40% saving)
  • Reduce their £200,000 liquidation fee to £100,000 (50% saving)
  • End the administration immediately, and place the company into a creditors’ voluntary liquidation (CVL)

This strategy increased the amount paid out to creditors by £380,000. Moreover, the length of time the client had to wait before receiving a payment was drastically reduced.

Commercial Debt Collection: Challenges and Best Practices


Commercial debt collection is the process through which outstanding debts owed by commercial entities are recovered, typically stemming from goods delivered or services rendered on…

Read More

Gibraltar Financial Services Commission: A Lesson in Financial Regulation


The recent collapse of High Street Group and its security trustee, Castle Trust Management and Services, prompts a closer examination of regulatory practices. Along with…

Read More
de trafford

De Trafford Third Party Recovery: An Update


The recent financial collapse of multiple DeTrafford property development companies hassignificantly impacted purchasers. As they navigate the consequences, a glimmer of hope arises asthe wheels…

Read More
Northumberland Living

Northumberland Living Developments: Allegations and Challenges


Northumberland Living, In West Chevington Farm, Druridge Bay, is a development poised for completion. Only to be stalled by an apparent unforeseen historical conveyancing issue.…

Read More