David Cameron Paves Way for HMRC to Target PAYE and NIC Dodgers

The Prime Minister announced the deepest public spending cuts for decades

From April 2012, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will require a security from employers if they suspect National Insurance Contributions (NIC) and Pay As You Earn (PAYE) taxes will be unpaid.

HMRC claims the new legislation, which includes a criminal offence for business owners that are asked to give security but fail to do so, targets employers guilty of ‘serious non-compliance’.

The announcement should be of particular interest to small-to-medium business owners looking to raise finance because they won’t be able use assets controlled by HMRC to secure additional loans.

Additionally, if a company goes into liquidation with serious VAT debt and the director(s) launch another business, the taxman will require a deposit before they allow the new venture to be VAT registered.

As these provisions already exist in relation to VAT, HMRC is simply trying to reduce the number of employers who pay VAT, but ignore NIC and PAYE.

When it comes to debt collection, HMRC are becoming increasingly more aggressive, particularly with small-to-medium businesses who should understand the new legislation effectively places the taxman ahead of other creditors.

Ex-Prime Minister and Chancellor Gordon Brown supported small businesses by introducing Time to Pay Agreements and removing the taxman’s status as a preferential creditor through the Enterprise Act 2002.

In contrast, David Cameron’s Tory-led coalition appears to be giving HMRC back their preferential status through the back door.

All creditors, unless they are secured, should be treated equally. That HMRC can ask employers for a deposit brings inequality and makes them a preferential creditor in everything but name.

Posted in ,

79th Group: The Webster’s’ Bankruptcies. Reset or the Walls Closing In?

02/02/2026

The position of the former The 79th Group directors has now moved into a far more serious phase. Three of the four directors are bankrupt.…

New Capital Link: A Case Study in How Not to Do Pre-Action Correspondence

30/01/2026

Regular readers of this blog will already be familiar with New Capital Link, its associates, and the issues raised in our previous reporting. Those articles…

The Danger of Waiting: Why Delayed Action Destroys Third Party Action

22/01/2026

Most investors do not lose their ability to recover money because the law is complicated. They lose it through hesitation. An update is expected. Reassurance…

79th Group Update: The Webster Family Freezing Order – Decisive Action or Delayed Optics?

21/11/2025

A worldwide freezing order (WFO) was recently granted against David Webster and his sons Jake and Curtis. Long‑time directors and central figures in the 79th…