Poor Policing Leaves HMRC Exposed

Insolvency Service Leaves HMRC ExposedI strongly disagree with the Insolvency Service’s recent claim the organisation ‘…does not hesitate to punish irresponsible directors.’

The statement was in response to a story published last month that revealed how a couple from Worcester who failed to pay National Insurance and Pay As You Earn taxes for a care home they ran had been banned from being company directors for three-and-a-half years each.

While their company’s turnover had exceeded £1.6 million between 1 June 2005 and 28 February 2010, Malcolm Herbert and his wife Esther ran up debts of around £300,000, including almost £180,000 to HM Revenue and Customs (HRMC).

According to Clive Tranter, an investigator at the Insolvency Service (IS): ‘The IS has strong enforcement powers and we will not hesitate to use them to remove from the business environment directors who fail to properly carry out their responsibilities, as has been demonstrated in this case.’

However, the reality is; incidents such as this are not isolated, but commonplace. There were 20,000 corporate insolvencies in 2011 and according to Simon Plant, a partner at business turnaround specialists SFP, in 75 per cent of cases, HMRC was the single largest creditor.

According to IS statistics, during the same period, on average one in every 14 insolvency cases ends with a director being disqualified. I think that figure is appallingly low and suggests either very poor or little policing is really being done.

Similarly, earlier this year, HMRC refused to reveal exactly how much it is owed by small businesses between 1 February 2011 and 31 January 2012 and how much it spends trying to recover this revenue, which suggests there may be some considerable disparity between the two figures.

HMRC is a soft touch and the business community and directors are continuously trying to use the taxman as a banker of last resort.

The sad thing is: it is British citizens who suffer because when these companies fail owing large amounts to HMRC, government coffers – already stressed from austerity cuts – come under further pressure.

Moreover, why is so little emphasis put on repatriating funds back to HMRC and other creditors; there are provisions for this in the Insolvency Act, but it rarely happens?

The IS claims to be coming down hard on irresponsible directors, but all too often, the organisation has a lacklustre approach that leaves HMRC exposed.

Posted in ,

Understanding the winding up petition: A crucial tool


In the world of insolvency, a winding up petition holds significant importance. When a company has received a statutory demand (SD) and fails to raise…

Read More

Urgent Call to Action: Have You Invested in Beech Holdings (Manchester) Ltd?


If you or anyone you know has invested in Beech Holdings (Manchester) Ltd, it’s time to take action immediately and get in touch. The Situation…

Read More

Bankruptcy Annulment: A Fresh Start for Financial Recovery


Bankruptcy is often viewed as a last resort for individuals overwhelmed by debt, offering a path to financial relief but also leaving a significant mark…

Read More

Castle Trust and Management Services Ltd- The Big Problem for the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission


The collapse of Castle Trust and Management Services Ltd (CTMS) has raised serious questions aboutthe role and effectiveness of the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission (GFSC)…

Read More