Is the director disqualification process futile?

In March 2022, P&O Ferries’ chief executive Peter Hebblethwaite brutally dismissed 800 workers without the consultation required under UK law. His actions led to the press and people on social media demanding consequences for such insensitive and potentially unlawful actions.
Additionally, the government agency responsible for investigating director misconduct, the Insolvency Service, has commenced civil and criminal proceedings. The Trades Union Congress (TUC) also called for Hebblethwaite to be disqualified as a company director.
Last month, the TUC wrote to the Insolvency Service claiming that P&O’s directors had breached the Companies Act by failing to regard the welfare of their employees.
Flawed director disqualification process
This sounds good in theory. But there are also two important questions that need answering:
- How effective are these inquiries into company director misconduct?
- Is the Director Disqualifications process too soft?
We’ve seen many inquiries before, most notably into RBS Bank after the financial crises. But in all honesty, very little came of it. It’s hard to verify the misdemeanours of a company director. And even if wrongdoing is proven, the penalties and enforcement are feeble.
The power to strike off a company director rests with the Insolvency Service. But the agency’s resources are stretched.
Insolvency Service objectives
Rather than targeting devious and delinquent directors, the agency’s primarily concerned with:
- Supporting those in financial distress
- Tackling financial wrongdoing
- Maximising returns to creditors
Furthermore, on the rare occasion there’s an insolvency investigation, the agency tends to:
- Target low-hanging fruit offenses such as failure to keep proper records
- Avoid more contentious issues
In truth, there isn’t any real evidence the director disqualification process is a successful sanction for director misfeasance and unlawful conduct. Many of the directors who receive this punishment simply set up new companies in a spouse or relative’s name.
The director disqualification process in the UK remains in limbo without tougher regulations and a more professional framework for corporate directors.
A Difficult Truth: The 79th Group’s Latest Statement
On 10 April, The 79th Group issued a public statement in response to the ongoing investigation by the City of London Police, which can be…
Read MoreThe Cold Truth About The 79th Group, the Police, and Your Money
The 79th Group Loan Notes Recovery Over the past several months, a growing number of investors have come forward, alarmed and confused by what’s happening…
Read MoreHigh Street GRP – The Security That Never Was…
High Street GRP promised investors that their money was safe — secured against valuable real estate. In reality, there was no meaningful security, and over…
Read MoreThe 79th Group Loan Notes- Troubling Security Trustee Issues
As The 79th Group suspends redemption and interest payments on its loan notes and ceases to respond to concerned investors, scrutiny is intensifying over the…
Read More