Is the director disqualification process futile?

Calls for P&O chief executive Peter Hebblethwaite to face Director Disqualification Proceedings…

In March 2022, P&O Ferries’ chief executive Peter Hebblethwaite brutally dismissed 800 workers without the consultation required under UK law. His actions led to the press and people on social media demanding consequences for such insensitive and potentially unlawful actions.

Additionally, the government agency responsible for investigating director misconduct, the Insolvency Service, has commenced civil and criminal proceedings. The Trades Union Congress (TUC) also called for Hebblethwaite to be disqualified as a company director.

Last month, the TUC wrote to the Insolvency Service claiming that P&O’s directors had breached the Companies Act by failing to regard the welfare of their employees.

Flawed director disqualification process

This sounds good in theory. But there are also two important questions that need answering:

  1. How effective are these inquiries into company director misconduct?
  2. Is the Director Disqualifications process too soft?  

We’ve seen many inquiries before, most notably into RBS Bank after the financial crises. But in all honesty, very little came of it. It’s hard to verify the misdemeanours of a company director. And even if wrongdoing is proven, the penalties and enforcement are feeble.

The power to strike off a company director rests with the Insolvency Service. But the agency’s resources are stretched.

Insolvency Service objectives

Rather than targeting devious and delinquent directors, the agency’s primarily concerned with:

  • Supporting those in financial distress
  • Tackling financial wrongdoing
  • Maximising returns to creditors

Furthermore, on the rare occasion there’s an insolvency investigation, the agency tends to:

  • Target low-hanging fruit offenses such as failure to keep proper records
  • Avoid more contentious issues

In truth, there isn’t any real evidence the director disqualification process is a successful sanction for director misfeasance and unlawful conduct. Many of the directors who receive this punishment simply set up new companies in a spouse or relative’s name.

The director disqualification process in the UK remains in limbo without tougher regulations and a more professional framework for corporate directors.

Understanding the winding up petition: A crucial tool

12/07/2024

In the world of insolvency, a winding up petition holds significant importance. When a company has received a statutory demand (SD) and fails to raise…

Read More

Urgent Call to Action: Have You Invested in Beech Holdings (Manchester) Ltd?

12/06/2024

If you or anyone you know has invested in Beech Holdings (Manchester) Ltd, it’s time to take action immediately and get in touch. The Situation…

Read More

Bankruptcy Annulment: A Fresh Start for Financial Recovery

07/06/2024

Bankruptcy is often viewed as a last resort for individuals overwhelmed by debt, offering a path to financial relief but also leaving a significant mark…

Read More
GFSC

Castle Trust and Management Services Ltd- The Big Problem for the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission

03/06/2024

The collapse of Castle Trust and Management Services Ltd (CTMS) has raised serious questions aboutthe role and effectiveness of the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission (GFSC)…

Read More