Government targets Bounce Back Loan abusers

Insolvency practitioners must target company directors for Bounce Back Loan abuse…

Accused of misconduct, misfeasance, or some other wrongdoing? If so, you’d be wise to carefully consider your options moving forward.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, UK businesses received billions of Government aid through CBILS, furlough, and Bounce Back Loan schemes. In total, Bounce Back Loan distributions comprised around £40bn.

However, the Government’s Insolvency Service has identified wide scale Bounce Back Loan abuse. Consequently, the agency recently launched a campaign to ensure that all licensed insolvency practitioners (IPs) investigate directors accused of misconduct.

Traditionally, IPs investigate for evidence of deceit, misfeasance, and mismanagement. Now, they must also establish if the director obtained support loans. Furthermore, an IP is required to analyse the company’s bank statements to determine:  

  • The total sum any Bounce Back Loans received
  • The date of loan applications
  • The company’s eligibility for the scheme
  • If the director exaggerated turnover and misspent the loan
  • If the director or any connected parties received proceeds from the loans

Bounce Back Loan abuse

A company director who misuses a Bounce Back Loan could:

  • Face prosecution
  • Receive a ban from managing companies for up to 15 years

For example, a director who obtained a Bounce Back Loan without trading the company was recently disqualified for 13 years. Similarly, a director received a 10-year ban for overstating turnover by 500% and failing to explain where the money went.

Immediately seek advice from an IP, a lawyer, or a professional independent advisor if you’re a business owner who is:

  • Accused of abusing a Bounce Back Loan or some other wrongdoing
  • Facing Director Disqualification Proceedings
  • Thinking about hiring an IP to place a company into a statutory insolvency procedure such as liquidation, administration, or company voluntary arrangement (CVA)

Four serious challenges

If you are in any of these situations, you’ll have to overcome at least four serious challenges because:  

  1. Lawyers are expensive
  2. Your IP may use the information you disclose to bring misfeasance or Director Disqualification Proceedings against you
  3. IPs are licensed and regulated to prioritise and protect the rights of the businesses you owe (creditors) in statutory insolvency procedures
  4. Lawyers and IPs earn by realising the assets of insolvent companies (or their directors if necessary)

An independent professional can help you navigate insolvency, misconduct, and Director Disqualification proceedings, irrespective of the circumstance. Use our advice to represent yourself, or authorise Insolvency & Law to act on your behalf.

Either way, we’ll guide you through the process and:

  • Devise a strategy to help rescue your business and protect your assets
  • Achieve favourable results in administration, liquidation, bankruptcy, and CVA procedures
  • Liaise with your insolvency practitioner (IP)

Call 0207 504 1300 now for free and impartial business rescue advice…

Northumberland Living

Billy Jackson Update Part 2: Companies of Interest

04/07/2025

In our last blog on Billy Jackson, we exposed the web of enablers supporting his business operations. In this follow-up, we turn the spotlight on…

Read More

Tory Insider Robert Findon Linked to Fraud and Failed Schemes

27/06/2025

New Capital Link, the Conservative Party, and the Investment Questions Nobody Is Asking In the world of high-risk unregulated investments, strange partnerships are nothing new.…

Read More

Debtor Alert: Theodore Global Ltd

20/06/2025

Theodore Global Ltd: A Company That Fails to Pay Its Staff and Trades While Insolvent If you’re thinking about working with, or for Theodore Global…

Read More

Irene MacKenzie- The Gatekeeper of Silence

20/06/2025

Irene MacKenzie and the Web Around William Jackson In the shadows of the alternative investment world, where buzzwords are abundant but redemptions are not, one…

Read More