Directors guilty of BBL abuse face disqualification

A few months back, we protested the Insolvency Service’s decision to chase the owners of failed businesses for failing to repay Bounce Back Loans.
However, the findings of a report by the House of Commons public accounts committee suggest the agency’s strategy may be appropriate after all. To help struggling small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) during the Covid-19 pandemic, in 2020 the Government launched a series of finance-based initiatives including the:
- Bounce Back Loan (BBL)
- Eat Out to Help Out
- Coronavirus Job Retention (Furlough)
- Coronavirus Business Interruption (CBILS)
But according to the report, up to 60% of the £47 billion loaned to SME’s via the Bounce Back Loan scheme could be lost due to 2 key factors:
- Fraud
- Inability to pay
Strict punishments for directors
Under these circumstances, British taxpayers will end up paying for all the BBL losses. Consequently, Insolvency Service investigators recently launched a campaign targeting with a vengeance all business owners and company directors who:
- Used false or misleading information
- Abandoned or dissolved the limited company after obtaining a Bounce Back Loan
Few people are aware of the Insolvency Service’s new initiative. Punishments are strict because taxpayers’ money is involved. A director of a limited company who commits fraud, or some other act of misconduct, while in office could be:
- Prosecuted under criminal law
- Banned from managing a company for up to 15 years
The sad truth is that in recent years, a worrying number of company directors and business owners have been guilty of abuse. In attempting to survive the fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic, many have committed acts of wrongdoing. Some consciously, others less so.
For example, transferring any part of a Bounce Back Loan (BBL) into your personal account is an abuse, especially if you:
- Closed the account
- Used a company that was insolvent at the time
Point 2. is particularly concerning as the pandemic has greatly increased the number of ‘zombie’ companies trading while insolvent.
Still, generally speaking, BBL problems only arise for directors who stop repaying the loan, or pay nothing at all. A director who commits BBL abuse, but repays the loan is unlikely to face serious recriminations.
Who’s Behind Billy Jackson? Uncovering the Team and the Companies
Part 3- Unravelling the Team Behind Billy Jackson Executive Summary -Billy Jackson operates a network of companies heavily reliant on Loan Note investments, many of…
Read MoreThe 79th Group Update-What You Need To Know
Administrations, Court Cases, and What Loan Note Holders Must Know Now The financial collapse of companies within The 79th Group is rapidly entering a critical…
Read MoreT&T Trustees Appoint Administrators to 79th Luxury Living Six
Are Investor Interests Being Protected? A New Twist in The 79th Group Saga Loan note holders in 79th Luxury Living Six Ltd (LL6) were recently…
Read MoreA Difficult Truth: The 79th Group’s Latest Statement
On 10 April, The 79th Group issued a public statement in response to the ongoing investigation by the City of London Police, which can be…
Read More