Directors guilty of BBL abuse face disqualification

Directors who abuse Bounce Back Loans face disqualification and criminal prosecution

A few months back, we protested the Insolvency Service’s decision to chase the owners of failed businesses for failing to repay Bounce Back Loans.

However, the findings of a report by the House of Commons public accounts committee suggest the agency’s strategy may be appropriate after all. To help struggling small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) during the Covid-19 pandemic, in 2020 the Government launched a series of finance-based initiatives including the:

  • Bounce Back Loan (BBL)
  • Eat Out to Help Out
  • Coronavirus Job Retention (Furlough)
  • Coronavirus Business Interruption (CBILS)

But according to the report, up to 60% of the £47 billion loaned to SME’s via the Bounce Back Loan scheme could be lost due to 2 key factors:

  • Fraud
  • Inability to pay

Strict punishments for directors

Under these circumstances, British taxpayers will end up paying for all the BBL losses. Consequently, Insolvency Service investigators recently launched a campaign targeting with a vengeance all business owners and company directors who:

  • Used false or misleading information
  • Abandoned or dissolved the limited company after obtaining a Bounce Back Loan

Few people are aware of the Insolvency Service’s new initiative. Punishments are strict because taxpayers’ money is involved. A director of a limited company who commits fraud, or some other act of misconduct, while in office could be:

The sad truth is that in recent years, a worrying number of company directors and business owners have been guilty of abuse. In attempting to survive the fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic, many have committed acts of wrongdoing. Some consciously, others less so.

For example, transferring any part of a Bounce Back Loan (BBL) into your personal account is an abuse, especially if you:

  1. Closed the account
  2. Used a company that was insolvent at the time

Point 2. is particularly concerning as the pandemic has greatly increased the number of ‘zombie’ companies trading while insolvent.

Still, generally speaking, BBL problems only arise for directors who stop repaying the loan, or pay nothing at all. A director who commits BBL abuse, but repays the loan is unlikely to face serious recriminations.


Gibraltar Financial Services Commission: A Lesson in Financial Regulation


The recent collapse of High Street Group and its security trustee, Castle Trust Management and Services, prompts a closer examination of regulatory practices. Along with…

Read More
de trafford

De Trafford Third Party Recovery: An Update


The recent financial collapse of multiple DeTrafford property development companies hassignificantly impacted purchasers. As they navigate the consequences, a glimmer of hope arises asthe wheels…

Read More
Northumberland Living

Northumberland Living Developments: Allegations and Challenges


Northumberland Living, In West Chevington Farm, Druridge Bay, is a development poised for completion. Only to be stalled by an apparent unforeseen historical conveyancing issue.…

Read More
st anne's limited development

St Anne’s Street Limited: The Perils of Off-Plan Property Purchases


Two luxury housing developments in Liverpool have faced major setbacks, leaving purchasers indespair and dreams of new homes shattered. St Anne’s Street Limited and Chaloner…

Read More