Directors guilty of BBL abuse face disqualification
A few months back, we protested the Insolvency Service’s decision to chase the owners of failed businesses for failing to repay Bounce Back Loans.
However, the findings of a report by the House of Commons public accounts committee suggest the agency’s strategy may be appropriate after all. To help struggling small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) during the Covid-19 pandemic, in 2020 the Government launched a series of finance-based initiatives including the:
- Bounce Back Loan (BBL)
- Eat Out to Help Out
- Coronavirus Job Retention (Furlough)
- Coronavirus Business Interruption (CBILS)
But according to the report, up to 60% of the £47 billion loaned to SME’s via the Bounce Back Loan scheme could be lost due to 2 key factors:
- Fraud
- Inability to pay
Strict punishments for directors
Under these circumstances, British taxpayers will end up paying for all the BBL losses. Consequently, Insolvency Service investigators recently launched a campaign targeting with a vengeance all business owners and company directors who:
- Used false or misleading information
- Abandoned or dissolved the limited company after obtaining a Bounce Back Loan
Few people are aware of the Insolvency Service’s new initiative. Punishments are strict because taxpayers’ money is involved. A director of a limited company who commits fraud, or some other act of misconduct, while in office could be:
- Prosecuted under criminal law
- Banned from managing a company for up to 15 years
The sad truth is that in recent years, a worrying number of company directors and business owners have been guilty of abuse. In attempting to survive the fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic, many have committed acts of wrongdoing. Some consciously, others less so.
For example, transferring any part of a Bounce Back Loan (BBL) into your personal account is an abuse, especially if you:
- Closed the account
- Used a company that was insolvent at the time
Point 2. is particularly concerning as the pandemic has greatly increased the number of ‘zombie’ companies trading while insolvent.
Still, generally speaking, BBL problems only arise for directors who stop repaying the loan, or pay nothing at all. A director who commits BBL abuse, but repays the loan is unlikely to face serious recriminations.
Gibraltar Financial Services Commission: A Lesson in Financial Regulation
The recent collapse of High Street Group and its security trustee, Castle Trust Management and Services, prompts a closer examination of regulatory practices. Along with…
Read MoreDe Trafford Third Party Recovery: An Update
The recent financial collapse of multiple DeTrafford property development companies hassignificantly impacted purchasers. As they navigate the consequences, a glimmer of hope arises asthe wheels…
Read MoreNorthumberland Living Developments: Allegations and Challenges
Northumberland Living, In West Chevington Farm, Druridge Bay, is a development poised for completion. Only to be stalled by an apparent unforeseen historical conveyancing issue.…
Read MoreSt Anne’s Street Limited: The Perils of Off-Plan Property Purchases
Two luxury housing developments in Liverpool have faced major setbacks, leaving purchasers indespair and dreams of new homes shattered. St Anne’s Street Limited and Chaloner…
Read More