Director disqualification for dodgy wine dealer

10-year company director disqualification for wine expert William Mason

Earlier this month, former wine investor William Geoffrey Mason received a 10-year company director disqualification.

An Insolvency Service investigation found that Mason, 54, “abused” hundreds of thousands of pounds investors paid his company. Between 2001 and 2019, Mason’s business, William Mason Fine Wines (WMFW), received more than £445,000 in payments from investors.

However, investigators concluded that in most cases, the wine company broke contracts and agreements by either:

  1. Failing to purchase wine
  2. Buying and disposing of alcohol without notifying investors  

Administrators liquidating WMFW, which was eventually wound up in November 2020, noted that Mason’s company had no wine in stock.

Company director disqualification

Astonishingly, some of WMFW’s unluckiest investors were formerly good friends with Mason. No doubt, that familiarity led them to trust him with their money.

David Argyle, the Insolvency Service’s deputy head of insolvent investigations said: “10 years is a significant disqualification and sends a stark warning to directors who think they can abuse their investors that we will pursue the strictest restrictions and remove them from the corporate arena.”

Without specific permission from a court, disqualified company directors cannot:

  • Act as the director of a company
  • Take part, directly or indirectly, in the promotion, formation, or management of a company or limited liability partnership
  • Be in receipt of a company’s property

Stricter punishments

Previously, we discussed whether the punishments for misdemeanours such as these are severe enough in the UK. It’s a serious issue when you consider how many investors can be adversely affected by a single company director’s misfeasance.

Some business owners avoid punishment by continuing to run companies unofficially, reaping the benefits of directorship while remaining disqualified. The consequences for this type of behaviour are much harsher in the US where many more directors face criminal prosecution.

Perhaps it’s time to consider stricter penalties for greedy, abusive, and delinquent directors?

the 79th group

The 79th Group Update-What You Need To Know

05/05/2025

Administrations, Court Cases, and What Loan Note Holders Must Know Now The financial collapse of companies within The 79th Group is rapidly entering a critical…

Read More

T&T Trustees Appoint Administrators to 79th Luxury Living Six

25/04/2025

Are Investor Interests Being Protected? A New Twist in The 79th Group Saga Loan note holders in 79th Luxury Living Six Ltd (LL6) were recently…

Read More
the 79th group

A Difficult Truth: The 79th Group’s Latest Statement

17/04/2025

On 10 April, The 79th Group issued a public statement in response to the ongoing investigation by the City of London Police, which can be…

Read More
the 79th group

The Cold Truth About The 79th Group, the Police, and Your Money

11/04/2025

The 79th Group Loan Notes Recovery Over the past several months, a growing number of investors have come forward, alarmed and confused by what’s happening…

Read More